Whenever a client of The Caudill Law Office receives a federal grand jury subpoena, I advise them of their rights under federal law. Federal investigations are generally intimidating, lengthy and stressful ordeals. The grand jury’s “principal function is to determine whether or not there is probable cause to believe that one or more persons committed a certain federal offense,” says the U.S. Attorney’s Manual.
Prosecutors with the Justice Department and U.S. Attorney’s Offices will characterize a person in one of three categories: target, subject or witness. Distinguishing between these categories is extremely important in matters of legal advice. Moreover, the person’s status will help determine viable options to make a key decision for the client on how to proceed. Counsel’s understanding of the client’s status in a federal investigation is crucial to making the right decision.
A “target” is a person as to whom the prosecutor or the grand jury has substantial evidence linking him or her to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a putative defendant. An officer or employee of an organization which is a target is not automatically considered a target even if such officer’s or employee’s conduct contributed to the commission of the crime by the target organization. The same lack of automatic target status holds true for organizations which employ, or employed, an officer or employee who is a target.
While being characterized as a target provides ample warning of a person’s exposure to being indicted, the status of a subject puts the person in the middle category. A “subject” of an investigation is a person whose conduct is within the scope of the grand jury’s investigation.
A “witness” is normally a person from whom the agents need information and assistance but has no exposure in the investigation (i.e., records custodian). Generally, if a witness receives a grand jury subpoena, it may be possible to provide documents and/or an interview that will avoid the need for live testimony before the grand jury. The assistant U.S. attorney (AUSA) may even include a cover letter that tells the witness that production of the documents in advance of the grand jury date may alleviate the need to personally appear.
The federal grand jury may properly subpoena a subject or a target of the investigation and question the target about his/her involvement in the crime under investigation. However, it is extremely unusual for a prosecutor to subpoena a target to testify before the grand jury. If that happens and counsel informs the prosecutor in writing that the client will assert his/her Fifth Amendment privilege, the U.S. Attorney’s Manual suggests that the prosecutor withdraw the subpoena.
When a person is a “subject” in an investigation and called to testify before the grand jury, U.S. Attorney will advise the person of the following rights:
The person needs to decide whether or not to cooperate in the investigation. Federal agents often attempt to conduct an interview with the person when they first contact them to serve a grand jury subpoena. If the person “lawyers up” at the outset, the agent will simply serve the subpoena. However, agents will typically show up without notice at the person’s home or business in an effort to get some statements or even a full-fledged interview before the person realizes that he/she should first discuss the matter with legal counsel.
Review by Kyra Robinson
John is an amazing attorney! He’s both very professional and personable. I highly recommend him to others because I know he’ll get the job done. Best attorney in the tri-state!
Review by Christon Woods
John is an exceptional lawyer and mentor. He’s helped me at my lowest and motivated me to be a better man all around. I was falsely accused of a crime and I went to trial with my back against the wall but john was right by my side through thick and thin. Whenever you hire a lawyer like john he’s...
Review by B Washington
I recently had the privilege of being represented by Attorney John Caudill and I cannot express enough gratitude for the exceptional legal services he provided for me. Throughout the entire legal process, John demonstrated unwavering dedication, professionalism, and an impressive depth of legal knowledge. From the moment I contacted John and told him my side of the story he let...
Review by Honei ford
If you’re looking for an attorney Mr. John Caudill is the one you need. He took care of me in bowling green Kentucky you can count on him in your time of need. Very professional
Review by Brandon Sutton
I just can not say enough great things about this man, as a person and an attorney. He help me and my wife through the roughest part our lives thus far. You can not go wrong by choosing him. His passion to help us was just remarkable. And we can not thank him enough.